The presentation had a lot of great ideas and pictures. The only thing is the slide show went a little too fast. Otherwise, they did a good job presenting.
I liked the pictures. However, they were almost a little distracting. The simple powerpoint and robust presentation made a very good combination though, and made for a very well done project.
I thought it was very interesting how you incorporated the left brained senses allong with the right brained senses. It was a great way of showing how both sides of the brain are important in life but one is not more importnat than the other, rather, they must work together.
I think it is good that all of your pictures are organized, however the pictures seem to be going to very quickly. Also you might have wanted to choose just a couple of those senses because that is a lot to get done in only ten minutes.
Good talking though, good projectiong of your voice.
The information was on point, but I am not sure how it reaches further than the points made by Daniel Pink. Good timing as well. The thought web looked very in depth and nicely organized, but the display wasn't very effective for this type of presentation. Eric did a nice job of going outside of the information on the slides. Nate needed more talking time.
The video wasn't really with your presentation at all times. It was at some points ahead of you, and this made you speak more quickly. Logic, order, and reality weren't even in the book, and I was confused on that. I was confused on how you went through it, and then you went through it again in a different order. I missed of the citations with the pictures, although they were in works cited. You had great voices and made great eye contact!
Really good job. The movie was a little rushed but they pulled it together and got back on track without seeming rushed or stressed. Eric seemed very prepared and it appeared like he was completely aware of everything he was doing and knew his presentation like the back of his hand. The web was really interesting and had some fantastic connections to things such as religion and all of their senses. When their was an inaccuracy in the web Eric quickly improvised what should have been there and it was really very impressive.
The statue was a good example of logic because it's thinking and it's very familiar to everyone, so people knew what it meant. When they were talking about left brain and right brain, I think it would be more interesting if one person dressed more left brained and not creative, and the other was very creative in the way they dressed. That would have also kept the audience's attention. Of course with this, each person would have been responsible for just left brain or right brain feelings. The pictures were very interesting and good. Great job! And that's a lot of resources! Also, the web was good for the left brain thinkers while the slide show was good for the right brain thinkers.
I like how you did it in a movie setup, not choppy. The outline was a good idea to help tie everything together,but it was really spread out and a little difficult to interpret.
Within the presentation, the pictures were very well supported- they kept audiences attention. The 'web' was hard to read and difficult to follow along. Towards the end of the presentation, one could get board easily- needed reduce explanations.
There were too many photos on the movie, it seemed like it controlled you rather than you giving the presentation. Im confused on where exactly the presentation is going, you explained all the senses and their meaning but you didn't relate it to something. The webspiration was confusing too, I couldn't exactly read it. I think you contradicted yourselves when saying we need creativity and right brain aspects and didn't apply them.
I like how this group used the example of learning a language to describe symphony.
ReplyDeleteinteresting topic, but a good presentation. A little to fast and rushed though.
ReplyDeleteThe information being shared is good and they have a lot of great things to say. It is hard to take all at once though.
ReplyDeleteThe presentation had a lot of great ideas and pictures. The only thing is the slide show went a little too fast. Otherwise, they did a good job presenting.
ReplyDeleteI liked the pictures they used and how they connected them all.
ReplyDeletegood examples, but the timing is a little off.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed the movie, I thought the colors were pretty and they really caught my attention. Great job!
ReplyDeleteI liked the pictures. However, they were almost a little distracting. The simple powerpoint and robust presentation made a very good combination though, and made for a very well done project.
ReplyDeleteI thought it was very interesting how you incorporated the left brained senses allong with the right brained senses. It was a great way of showing how both sides of the brain are important in life but one is not more importnat than the other, rather, they must work together.
ReplyDeleteI think it is good that all of your pictures are organized, however the pictures seem to be going to very quickly. Also you might have wanted to choose just a couple of those senses because that is a lot to get done in only ten minutes.
ReplyDeleteGood talking though, good projectiong of your voice.
Great stage presence! How they connected all the senses was really intriguing.
ReplyDeleteGreat job, I really enjoyed your video with all the pictures, while you were describing them.
ReplyDeleteThe information was on point, but I am not sure how it reaches further than the points made by Daniel Pink. Good timing as well. The thought web looked very in depth and nicely organized, but the display wasn't very effective for this type of presentation. Eric did a nice job of going outside of the information on the slides. Nate needed more talking time.
ReplyDeleteThe video wasn't really with your presentation at all times. It was at some points ahead of you, and this made you speak more quickly. Logic, order, and reality weren't even in the book, and I was confused on that. I was confused on how you went through it, and then you went through it again in a different order. I missed of the citations with the pictures, although they were in works cited. You had great voices and made great eye contact!
ReplyDeleteReally good job. The movie was a little rushed but they pulled it together and got back on track without seeming rushed or stressed. Eric seemed very prepared and it appeared like he was completely aware of everything he was doing and knew his presentation like the back of his hand. The web was really interesting and had some fantastic connections to things such as religion and all of their senses. When their was an inaccuracy in the web Eric quickly improvised what should have been there and it was really very impressive.
ReplyDeleteThe statue was a good example of logic because it's thinking and it's very familiar to everyone, so people knew what it meant. When they were talking about left brain and right brain, I think it would be more interesting if one person dressed more left brained and not creative, and the other was very creative in the way they dressed. That would have also kept the audience's attention. Of course with this, each person would have been responsible for just left brain or right brain feelings. The pictures were very interesting and good. Great job! And that's a lot of resources! Also, the web was good for the left brain thinkers while the slide show was good for the right brain thinkers.
ReplyDeleteI like how you did it in a movie setup, not choppy. The outline was a good idea to help tie everything together,but it was really spread out and a little difficult to interpret.
ReplyDeleteI felt as though Eric was rushing through what he had to say.
ReplyDeleteThe pictures were entertaining.
I liked the use of other media types.
Within the presentation, the pictures were very well supported- they kept audiences attention. The 'web' was hard to read and difficult to follow along. Towards the end of the presentation, one could get board easily- needed reduce explanations.
ReplyDeleteThere were too many photos on the movie, it seemed like it controlled you rather than you giving the presentation. Im confused on where exactly the presentation is going, you explained all the senses and their meaning but you didn't relate it to something. The webspiration was confusing too, I couldn't exactly read it. I think you contradicted yourselves when saying we need creativity and right brain aspects and didn't apply them.
ReplyDeleteGood job although I think that you needed to time it a little better. Good topic and all around a good presentation
ReplyDelete